Measuring Radiation in Snow

snow

On January 22-23 it snowed heavily in Tokyo. To see if it affects radiation measurements I ran out with a few geiger counters to see if I could detect any change.

Snow in Tokyo

To measure the fresh snow I used 3 geiger counters and absorption filters:

  • Inspector Alert with 2″ pancake for measurement in CPM
  • Thermo B20 for measurement in Bq/cm2 (calibration setting for Cesium, so will be off in case of other nuclides)
  • Thermo PRD for gamma dose rate in uSv/hr

Snow activity measurement

Well, I did measure quite different levels compared to what the “normal” post-Fukushima levels are in my neighborhood (background typically around 30-40 CPM or 0.05-0.07 uSv/hr on the PRD).  I used a cloth to capture fresh snow fall as opposed to measuring snow that already had accumulated.

I tested the snow my self, albeit not for isotopes but for activity decay (our SAM was not in reach that evening) I measured increased activity (upto 10 times background) in fresh snow and a decay of around 25-30 minutes after which the snow measured background. Also measured with absorption filters and concluded we were dealing with a primary beta source.  Next day measurement of snow (after it stopped snowing) showed no increased activity. This led me to conclude that we were dealing with possibly radon daughters. (background typically around 30-40 CPM)

Once home I posted my findings on the Safecast Google group and promptly got responses from various members:

1.  Safecaster Kalin Kozhuharov had also rushed out and done similar measurements with the Inspector:

“I did a bit of measuring too outside the building in the parking lot:

air: 48 cpm about 5cm snow: 177.2 cpm (from 5min total); same spot when show cleared: 970 cpm (from 5min total) 10L bucket of compressed snow, as clean as possible: 170.6 cpm (based on 5min total)

Inspector, mylar inside, 0.068mm ziplock bag, not much time to stabilize temperature

2. Joe Moross — also ran out in Ichikawa, Chiba and reported:

  • Very similar results out here in Ichikawa.  First I measured the empty sink: 47cpm.  Then I brought in a scoop of snow (roughly a liter) and dumped it in the same sink: 205cpm.
  • It was snowing when I boarded the bus at the station, but not when I got home 20 minutes later.  I deliberately collected only the fresh upper layer of snow

3. Marco Kalthoven form the Worschester Polytechnic Institute mentioned the increased radiation is likely coming from Radon daughters

4. Ian Goddard posted a useful link on the half life of radon components found in rain and snow. These matched very much the half life I observed that night and confirmed Marco’s point as well.

“…graphs of radon decay, two graph showing alpha- and beta-activity decay. The *x* axes go out to 8,000 minutes = 133.3 hours = 5.5 days. So this source recommends not testing rain samples for 5 days to clear out the radon-decay chain. [*] The source I cited previously practiced a 3-day wait for rains-sample testing to clear out the measure-confounding effects of radon”

So fresh snow is actually radioactive, albeit for a short period of time. What is important to note is that these phenomenas are regularly occurring and shouldn’t be mistaken for radiation coming from Fukushima.

P.S. No geiger counters were harmed in this experiment :-)

Safecasters Joe Moross and THE STIG in action in downtown Tokyo

4 Comments on “Measuring Radiation in Snow

  1. Wondering if you’ve had any recent experience testing food (rice, fish, etc) and water (tap or bottled)…I’m planning a trip to Japan in April but keep hearing anecdotes of cesium and other radioactive materials found in foodstuffs. Do you have any data to support or refute this? Thanks!

  2. The difference between Safecast.org and fukushima-diary.com is that people with Safecast are interested in truth, whereas the person behind fukushima-diary is interested in fear. One person sits at a computer and posts extremely-poorly translated rumors and anecdotes causing alarm, while others are out with Geiger counters and using knowledge to learn, measure, and understand.

    Safecast.org represents a healthy response, a positive response to a negative event, while fukushima-diary represents sickness.

    I am sure that the progress gained from the knowledge accumulated by Safecast will have benefit for future humans well beyond the scope of Japan.

  3. Dear Safecasters, I am planning soon a journey to Japan and I wanted to take my Inspector Alert Geiger Counter with me. Since you are using the same measurement geiger device, I wanted to ask you for advice about its transportation and usage. For example, is it safe to take the Inspector Alert with you in the aircraft cabin? The pancake tube won’t be damaged by different pressure experienced during the take-off, inflight and landing? Thank you very much for your answer and for any other information you’ll provide. Best regards. Luca M.

7ads6x98y